The Character of Caliban in Shakespeare’s The Tempest Essays -- Tempes

The Character of Caliban in Shakespeare’s The Tempest Caliban is one of the most interesting of Shakespeare’s characters. For centuries, scholars have puzzled over the meaning and importance of this central character. Who or what is this creature? Is he a man or a beast (Peterson, p.2)? Most of the people who have debated this question take the question itself at face value. Caliban is either a man or a beast. The other characters in the play dismiss him as a "poisonous slave," "savage," and "hag-seed" (Act 1, Scene 2), but that does not mean that the reader must do so as well. Let us take a closer look at Caliban the individual and evaluate the question of his humanity. In the end, I think we will see that Caliban is just as human as the other characters in the play. The first charge against Caliban is his shape. Prospero beckons him come by shouting, "What ho! Slave, Caliban!/ Thou earth, thou, speak!...Come thou tortoise!" Prospero does not even deign to place him among humankind; instead he is called "earth" as if he is part of the very ground-- the dirt that Prospero rules. Later, Trinculo calls him "A strange fish" and Stephano refers to him as a "monster of the isle with four legs." (2,2) Indeed, Caliban is never spoken of without some dehumanizing adjective added to the address. I would, however like to challenge the notion of his ugliness. During Shakespeare's day, there was a very narrow, very specific concept of beauty. For example, a woman was usually considered most beautiful if she was very fair. This showed that she was not exposed to the sun through any type of common labor and thus signified her gentility. To most of Elizabethan England, this concept of beauty was the only concept of beaut... ...ight not all be good ones, are, nevertheless, very human ones. In fact, most of Shakespeare's characters exhibit attributes far worse than Caliban's, yet their humanity is ever called into question. Consider Iago of Othello. Iago exhibited a startling lack of redeeming qualities, yet he was never called a monster. The only reason that Caliban should be called a "monster" lies in the only way he differs from the other characters-- his appearance. It is a shame that, while a modern audiences may question the treatment of Caliban, they do not often question the reason behind it, and by failing to do so, they, along with Prospero become slaves to their own preconceptions. Dale Peterson and Jane Goodall encompassed the lesson that we must learn from Caliban. They said, "By enslaving Caliban, we enslave ourselves. Only when we free Caliban will we free ourselves."

Pseudoscience: Critical Thinking and Author Essay

People often regard the ideas that are generally accepted by the multitudes as â€Å"truths†. However, many of them are not scientifically proven and lack logical and reasonable explanations. According to Saupe’s â€Å"What is Pseudoscience?†, such ideas are called â€Å"pseudoscience†. To be more specific, they are claimed to be scientific, but do not have objective evidence to prove that they are true. If people cannot distinguish between pseudoscience and scientifically proved science, the results would be consequential. False science would lead to the misunderstanding of things and cause people to do things wrongly and might lead to harms and damages eventually. To evaluate if the information is credible, there are some standards; for example, check the credentials of the author, check the credibility of the sources of the information and the relevant sources that the information contains and see if the author has good logics to prove the information ( Saupe, 2005). In the three articles, they all talked about the problems of globalization. They either claimed that globalization benefits the environment or causes harms. Among the three articles, â€Å"Green and Brown? Globalization and the Environment† by James J. Boyce appears to be the most credible. The most obvious indicator is that it comes from a published journal; according to the journal, the author’s credential is clearly addressed. In its thesis, the author examined the assumption that the â€Å"global North is relatively ‘green’ and the global South relatively ‘brown’†. He also argued that the claim of globalization leads to a convergence toward better or worse environmental practices cannot be proved by either theoretical or experimental evidence. To support his arguments, the author explained how it is uneven and what global polarization is. The arguments and the evidence the author used to prove his ideas are very logical and also credible since they are mainly from other peer-reviewed journals. The entire article appears to be reasonable and understandable. Thus, this article is considered to be the most credible one. Just a little bit not as good, the article â€Å"Globalization: Myths and Realities† by Jim Dolmas is ranked behind the previous article. In his article, although he has reliable credential, he did not make good use of facts as empirical evidence. The author explained too much by his own views and ideas, and did not use enough references to support what he said. Though, this is overall a credible enough article since the author’s claims and explanations still appear to be logical and understandable. The least credible article is â€Å"The Environmental Benefits of Globalization† by John A. Charles. First of all, the author does not have credential at all since it only mentioned his name and did not give any other information about such as his title or so. Then, while trying to prove that globalization benefits the environment, he did not use enough credible sources. The sources are also not well cited. Although the author still wrote logical and understandable supporting arguments and statements, they still lack the use of scientifically proved facts. As a result, this article appears to be more pseudoscientific. To give another example of pseudoscience, I believe that most of people have been warned not to eat high cholesterol food, such as seafood and eggs. These foods are bad for health because they cause people to have cholesterol level hike. What makes me concerned about this claim is that I have seen some people in my life who eat a lot of these food everyday but st ill stay in good health. In fact, according to my research, eating food that contains high cholesterol should not be worried like how people are afraid of eating them now. According to Johnson and Ridlen of the University of Illinois, eating foods like eggs actually does a little effects to human cholesterol level. The main reason that people have high cholesterol level is because their bodies themselves lack the ability to regulate the cholesterol in their blood stream. The intake of cholesterol from food is only partial the cholesterol in the bodies. In most of the cases, the overproduction of cholesterol of the body is the leading cause of high cholesterol level. Thus, people should not worry too much about eating eggs and other high cholesterol food if their bodies have good control over cholesterol regulation themselves, and we should not see eating eggs as a demon to avoid in our diet. Pseudoscience exists everywhere in our lives. To obtain the accurate knowledge and true science, we need to observe the world and keep questioning to examine the credibility of information to best avoid pseudoscience. Work Cited Boyce, J. K. (2004). Green and Brown? Globalization and The Environment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 105-128. Charles, J. A. (2004, July 14). The Environmental Benefits of Globalization. Global Envision. Retrieved from http://www.globalenvision.org/. Dolmas, J. (2004, September/October). Globalization: Myths and Realities. Federal Reserve Bank of Dellas, 13-14. Johnson, H. S., & Ridlen, S. F. (2013). Eggs and Cholesterol. Retrieved from University of Illinois Extensions website: http://urbanext.illinois.edu/eggs/. Saupe, S.G. (2005). What is Pseudoscience? Biology Department, St. John’s University, Collegeville, MN 56321.

Racial Prejudice in the Bluest Eye and to Kill a Mockingbird

In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, the reader is introduced to the theme of racial prejudice through the experiences of the characters Scout and Jem Finch. The story is told from the perspective of Scout. In Toni Morrison’s novel, The Bluest Eye, the reader is also introduced to the theme of racial prejudice through the experiences of Pecola Breedlove and Claudia MacTeer. The story is told through the perspective of Pecola Breedlove, and Claudia MacTeer. Both of the novels show different ways of illustrating the same theme. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, the reader sees the young and innocent children; Scout and Jem Finch become exposed to the racial prejudices of Maycomb. Scout is not like the typical young girl in†¦show more content†¦People in the African-American community express their self-hatred toward Pecola and degrade her. Pecola’s ugliness has made others feel beautiful, and her suffering has made others feel better about themselves. Pecola is regarded as an ‘ugly little black girl’ who is not worthy of any respect or dignity, and because Pecola continues to live after she becomes insane she serves as a reminder to the town or the ugliness and hatred that they have tried to repress. Claudia’s life is quite different from Pecola’s life. Claudia is a victim of beauty standards, as Pecola is, but Claudia is able to fight back against the standards because she has a stable family life. When Claudia is given a white doll to play with, she despises the doll, and dissects and destroys the doll, and Claudia hates Shirley Temple because Shirley is pretty and white â€Å"I hated Shirley. Not because she was cute, but because she danced with Bojangles, who was my friend, my uncle, my daddy, and who ought to have been soft-shoeing it and chuckling with me. Instead he was enjoying, sharing, giving a lovely dance thing with one of those little white girls whose socks never slid dow n under their heels†(Pg. 19). Claudia is not jaded because when Pecola becomes pregnant with Pecola’s father’s child Claudia tries to come up with a plan to save Pecola’s baby â€Å"We have to do it right, now. We’ll bury the money over by her house so we can’t go back and dig it up, and we’ll plant the

Organizational Politics And Political Behavior Essay

This weeks’ topic is quite interesting. I have seen and experienced organizational politics but I wasn’t aware there was an official term for this phenomenon. My experiences with organizational politics have been primarily negative but I understand that is only my perspective of it. According to Management-issues.com website, there are several positives to office politics (2004). For example, organizational politics can be used to â€Å"unlock barriers to change, create greater buy-in on key projects, produce more organizational cohesion and speed up decision-making† (Management-issues.com, 2004). Ideally, these are goals organizations aim to obtain daily. However, according to the site, the key factor to achieving these goals is the constructive use of organizational politics. When there are no common grounds or shared goals or if the actions or attitudes of senior management are negative, organizational politics tends to be more destructive. Our test offers several organizational factors that contribute to political behavior (DuBrin, 2013, p. 218). Of the factors mentioned, I am most familiar with the â€Å"subjective standards of performance† factor (DuBrin, 2013, p.218). Ironically, this emerged from a change in how my current employer decided to measure employee performance. About ten years ago, my company acquired several smaller companies within the same industry to expand its footprint domestically. The performance measurement tools used for within the various acquiredShow MoreRelatedOrganizational Politics1574 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction Organizational politics refers to behaviors â€Å"that occur on an informal basis within an organization and involve intentional acts of influence that are designed to protect or enhance individuals’ professional careers when conflicting courses of action are possible† (Drory, 1993; Porter, Allen, amp; Angle, 1981). Organizational politics is an elusive type of power relations in the workplace. It represents a unique domain of interpersonal relations, characterized by the direct or indirectRead MoreEssay on Organizational behavior809 Words   |  4 Pages To help us understand organizations, we might consider them as political systems. The political metaphor helps us understand power relationships in day-to-day organizational relationships. If we accept that power relations exist in organizations, then politics and politicking are an essential part of organizational life. Politics is a means of recognizing and, ultimately, reconciling competing interests within the organization. Competing interests can be reconciled by any number of means. For exampleRead MoreOrganizational Power and Politics1511 Words   |  7 PagesOrganizational Power and Politics Some employees believe that politics and power in the workplace is a game that corporate and management plays. However, games usually have rules to follow, a referee or judge, and an ending with a winner. Although politics has a winner, this game never ends, the rules are always subject to change, and there is no referee or spokesperson. Corporate traditions establish much of the biased game of politics that is played on the organizational level. Unfortunately, politicsRead MoreRelationship Between Managers And Managers1733 Words   |  7 Pagescapable of contributing to the success of an organization as well the allocation of power and politics. Upward relations. Organizational citizenship adds value to the success of upward relations. Organizational citizenship is at its essence, the belief that when you care for something and nurture it, the thing will thrive and be better able to support your own success (DuBrin, 2009, p.88). Organizational citizenship makes for a better organization that all stakeholders benefit from. The use of impressionRead MoreAn Organization Called Numi Organic Tea Essay1499 Words   |  6 Pagesthough the Numi Organic outsourcing, they still want people who are working for them to see the Numi’s values. This case study discussing about Numi Organic’s political behavior in this extended organization and the role and nature of ethical considerations in this behavior. Nature of the Organizational Politics Organizational politics can be considered as the activities that people inside the organization, perform to acquire, enhance, and use power and other resources to obtain their preferredRead MorePower and Politics906 Words   |  4 PagesHeader: Power and Politics Power and Politics Paper Wanda F. Carter Power and Politics A collective group of people with general goals is how organizations are first established and built. In order the goals to be achieved people will need to work together and behave in a way that is governed by rules, regulations, policies and other methods that have been established by the organization. This is normally accomplished through the process of influencing behaviors. Power is a taskRead More Power and Politics in Organizations Essay948 Words   |  4 PagesPower and Politics in Organizations Introduction Have you ever wondered what role politics and power play in organizations? When used effectively they can be compatible in reaching the organizations goals. Power is defined as the ability to get someone to do something you want done or the ability to make things happen in the way you want them. (Schermerhorn, Hunt, and Osborn, Chap. 15). Power is important within organizations because it is the way in which management influences individualsRead MoreEssay on Power and Politics977 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction Have you ever wondered what role politics and power play in organizations? When used effectively they can be compatible in reaching the organizations goals. Power is defined as the ability to get someone to do something you want done or the ability to make things happen in the way you want them. (Schermerhorn, Hunt, and Osborn, Chap. 15). Power is important within organizations because it is the way in which management influences individuals to make things happen. When powerRead MoreThe Purpose Of This Essay Is To Identify And Explain Key1314 Words   |  6 Pageshave learned in this course and provide a power and politics action plan that you can use immediately in your business. Furthermore, it is the intention to highlight leadership style, organization stability, culture, and diversity of the workforce as well as identify the need for communication within an organization. The individual factors contributing to the political behavior in organizations include; the political nature of human behavior, the need for power, Machiavellianism, the self-monitoringRead MoreLeadership : Leadership Behavior And Politics1370 Words   |  6 PagesLeadership Behaviors Politics Winning organizations today, attribute much of their success to having great people, great processes, and great leaders who inspire and motivate employees to follow them. Great leaders understand that they have influence and power over individuals, and what they do with this power defines them for years to come. We can all think of leaders of whom we respect and model our current behaviors after, and transversely, we can all think of leaders whose behaviors we are

Why The State Auditor s Office Is Responsible For...

The State Auditor s Office is responsible for evaluating the administration and management of public funds and programs to assure that the proper checks and balances. The State Auditor is the only entity that has by law, full access to all records, accounts, correspondence, and the internal files of state and local agencies. General Powers of the State Auditor include the power to subpoena records and take depositions (State Auditor s Oversight,n.d.). In this scenario, the results of a state audit with the addition to an internal investigation revealed that the agency in question is providing excellent service to middle class clients and doing a sub-par job with connecting less fortunate patients with needed ancillary services.†¦show more content†¦Typical Client Obstacles Some of the typical obstacles that interfere with to a client’s ability to access service across local agencies are lack of child care, physical disabilities, mental health problems, limited transportation and low literacy. Child Care Low-income families normally include children, partly because of younger family heads. Statically lower-income families include more children on average than higher-income families. Therefore, lower-income families commonly face costly child care (Kimmel, 2001). Physical Disability / Mental Health Problems Mental health and physical health are connected. Mental health effects a person’s ability to maintain proper physical health. Many mental illnesses, such as depression and anxiety will affect people’s ability to full participate in health-promoting behaviors. On the other hand, problems with physical health, such as chronic diseases, can impact mental health and decrease a person’s ability to participate in treatment and recover (Lando, Marshall Williams, Sturgis, Williams, 2006) Limited Transportation Most low-income households are lack the fund to keep up with the increase of transportation costs. They must come up with various ways to get from point A to point B. Low-income families must decide between driving, get a ride, taking mass transit, biking, or even walking. These

Ngos Free Essays

————————————————- NGOs or better known as non-governmental organisations are non-profitable organisations that pursue social aims that involve political aspects but are not political parties. As it sounds, NGOs maintain its non-governmental status by excluding participation from government representatives as members in the organisations. NGOs can be funded completely or partially by the government. We will write a custom essay sample on Ngos or any similar topic only for you Order Now NGO is usually run by a specially elected chairperson who is responsible to the operation of the organisation completely. ————————————————- NGOs can be divided into the ‘insider’ or  Ã¢â‚¬Ëœoutsider’ groups. ‘Insider’ groups have the advantage in policy-making as they maintain a close relationship with policy-makers. Such groups are trying to secure their aims and objectives by building up their network from inside and thus, the name of ‘Insider’ group. On the other hand, ‘outsider’ groups are more dependent on the public with the help of media in promoting their aims. ————————————————- It is said that NGOs are a better channel for society to voice out their concerns rather than political parties. This, we agree. As NGO members are not representing the government and mainly comprise by members who are local citizens on their own, NGOs are believed to give a fairer judgement on issues. This is because, in order to understand a situation, one must be in that situation so that effective solutions can be made and implemented and in this context, it is the local citizens who are voicing for themselves as they know exactly what are the problems the society is facing. ————————————————- NGOs are flexible in becoming accustomed to local conditions and responding to the local needs. For that reason, they can experiment freely with new approaches and take risks if necessary. They can develop integrated projects to help the local people. Their main aim is to help and serve the people and not to rule the country. ————————————————- With their doors open and ability to reach out to the citizens, people find it much more comfortable to speak out their hearts to NGOs without the fear of being imprisoned or facing penalty. This allows truth to be revealed where only then, further actions will be taken. Hence, NGOs become a place where people go to much frequently than parliaments. ————————————————- Another major advantage of NGOs being a reliable channel for commoners is that they have the capability of communicating at all levels. This means that they can easily interact with the local people and relay their messages to the top levels of the government. ————————————————- We, for one, must acknowledge the efforts NGOs had been doing for the past few years. NGOs have advocated and raised issues, concerns and needs for a specific user group. They raised point of view or general public interest that is not yet covered by legislation or other policy documents, instruments and measures. Furthermore, NGOs share their findings with the public after reaching out to citizens. In addition, NGOs also have experts with the knowledge on specific topics, playing a key role in setting the political agenda. Their analysis and researches identify current and future needs in society and provide crucial perspectives. ———————————————— We understand that there are eight different orientations in NGOs as in accord to Puhle (2001) such as professional associations, business, commerce and industry groups, trade unions, agricultural associations, single-issue interest groups, ideological groups, public interest groups and welfare associations. This i s a very systematic organisation where different issues can be channeled separately. For one, we often doubt whether donations that have been made go directly to the person or a community in need. Thus, charitable orientation NGOs such as UNICEF can be an organisation where citizens can see the results of their donations in curbing poverty and nurturing education for our future generation. Is this not a better option than donation without knowing where our money went? ————————————————- Besides, whenever a citizen has doubts on the leadership of a minister, government tends to cover up for the minister. In many cases, transparency is not practiced. Therefore, we believe that if these issues are channeled to the NGOs, they can be taken to a higher level and not just hid behind the lens of media. ———————————————— Many may have the idea that NGOs staffs are part-time volunteers but that is not the fact. Many NGOs are actually relying on highly professional paid staffs. This ensures NGOs are operating smoothly and of a high reliability. They are also capable of recruiting highly motivated staffs and experts with lesser restrictions than employees working for the government. Hence, this is another reason on why NGOs are a better channel for the society to voice out their concerns. ———————————————— NGOs collaborate with one another throughout the world so that together, they create a much sustainable and peaceful world. This enables global alliance which leads us back to a worthy reason on why NGO is a better channel for commoners to voice out their opinions on issues. When certain issues are brought up to the international level, these issues will be taken a higher priority and attract public attention. In a way, this helps in paving better solutions. —————————— ——————- United Nation, a global and massive organisation known to held conferences on various issues and matters throughout the year has big impact on many issues. Well-known to be handling issues revolving citizens, United Nation aids NGOs in providing alternative solutions in solving issues. For example, labour law implemented in the third world countries was found to be unfair among the labourers and United Nation along with other relevant NGOs, raised this question which attracted attention all over the world. Back then, labourers were so glad and grateful for the contribution made by the United Nation. ———————————————— NGOs are very important since they offer local communication, action and also distributing resources when there are no existing local organisations. In fact, an NGO provides a mechanism that could possibly work where the government has failed. As a result, it su pports grass roots initiatives as well as recognising and responding to the realities of the local people. ————————————————- Since NGOs are actual non-profit organizations, various projects can be achieved without having to use the government’s money. This is because there are many private donors who support the NGOs and this means that there will never be a lack of resources. Additionally, NGOs provide a good alternative to creating mass access structures which are supposingly extremely cumbersome, unreliable and costly. ————————————————- In conclusion, NGOs provide a suitable channel for commoners to voice out their concerns where all issues are handled maturely and efficiently with no bond to political rules. Thus, this ensures all issues are handled fairly regardless of race, religion and political aspects. How to cite Ngos, Papers

Violence And Nonviolence Essay Example For Students

Violence And Nonviolence Essay Violence is a problem that we as humans, deal with everyday. Today, it seemsthat we deal with it in just about every aspect of our lives. From childrenscartoons to the nightly news, we are witnesses to its power and harm. A highlydebated argument for the causes of violence are surrounding our homes as well asour government. No matter the causes of violence or for that fact aggressors, wehave a personal responsibility must be taken for violent actions. We are giventhe choice to decide how we each want to live our lives; but before we decide,we must look at the ethical issues that surround our choices. Most humans striveto live a good, pure life. Violence is one of the few instances that destroysthat good life. It is something that we work towards eliminating. It is definedas an act taken against another being with the intent to do harm. We oftenconsider violence in terms of the physical aggressor, yet violence can surfacein a variety of ways even including self-defense. Violence is a result ofconflicting interests or unresolvable differences. In most instances, bothparties to he conflict feel that they are right and that their actions arejustified. However, there are other cases in which their is a clear aggressorand victim. Nevertheless, violence is a very complicated and difficult issue. Byits very nature, violence is an act against life. Life, is sacred. It ischerished, not out of purpose of use, not instrumental, but for the good,intrinsic value of its very being. Violence is instrumental. It is a means to anend. There is no intrinsical goodness in violence. Violent acts are not good forthe sake of violence itself. A single question that arises out of the argumentof violence and nonviolence, Is violence ever justifiable or acceptable. The twomain types of arguments that arise are the self-defense paradigm and pacifism. The self-defense paradigm accepts violence as a means to protect ones life,or the life of others. This argument interprets life as being intrinsically goodand for instrumental purposes, but accepts lethal results as an unintendedconsequence of defense. Pacifism argues that violence is never acceptable. Because violence is an instrumental act, it undermines and disrespects humanlife as a cherished entity. Upon first evaluation of these arguments, Ipreferred the self-defense paradigm. I believe I am more of a realist. I thoughtthat violence was inevitable. No matter the strategy, violence is going to bethe end result. However, by the end of the semester, I have discoveredsomething. The whole purpose of pacifism is to change the fact that violence isinevitable. It is a movement that teaches humans how to deal with the situationsthat inevitably end in violence. It is a way to defend life from aggressivethreats. The pacifist may never risk killing his opponent, regardless of theconsequences. At all times, they must be respectful and compassionate of life. Ibelieve that I have changed my view because I have a greater understanding ofpacifism. At first, I thought that it was the easy way out. It was the way totake to avoid a situation; no matter the situation, never be violent. Ithought o f issues such as wars or if someone was trying to kill you or yourfamily. How could someone not do anything? It was a weak persons answer tothe argument. Then, out of the blue, it struck me. We are always talking aboutbettering the world, getting rid of violence. Well, we are imitativecreatures. We do what we see. How are the younger generation of people going tobe nonviolent when all they see is violence. If, we dont start demonstratingnonviolent, peaceful acts, what are they going to imitate? We are presentingself-defense as an excuse. It is justifiable but only if you dont intend tokill the other person. This can be a very risky situation. When defendingyourself or someone else, you are allowed violence as long as you didnt meanto kill the aggressor? What happens when you cant decipher the aggressor?Nothing should be taken away from the self-defense philosophy. It isunderstandable and ethical. It would be hard not to defend yourself from anattacker, or to help a loved one. But, i t just seems to me that in todaysworld, we must reevaluate our morals. Self-defense takes the idea that life isintrinsically good and should never be violated. It adds that life should neverbe violated but in certain cases. It seems like a double standard. Pacifism is amovement to take a stand against violence. It is giving violent situations achance of reversal. However, the choice of pacifism is a lifelong commitment. .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .postImageUrl , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:hover , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:visited , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:active { border:0!important; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:active , .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0 .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u869a8b013624bfab036f71828696bbd0:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Telemachus And Penelope EssayOne can not be a part time pacifist or a selective supporter of just wars. Thatis, one can not condemn violence, but when violent becomes a personal situation,find an excuse. The same in just wars. All wars must be unjust, not just some. Pacifism is a strong moral stand. It is dedication to preserving human life, nomatter the situation. A pacifist would have to take a stand which would notallow him to violently defended himself or others in any situation. Pacifism isdescribed as the higher calling because it witnesses the grandness andbeauty of being alive. Though the self-defense paradigm is a wonderfularguments, I think it contains a few discrepancies. There should be no excusefor harming another human being. Just because someone else started it, doesntmake it right or O.K. Philosophy